Case Study: Improving Home Comfort and Energy Efficiency with Thermal Modelling

The client, concerned about building a warm and healthy home, began to question whether the design was optimal. Was it too late to make changes, or could they still improve the house’s thermal performance before the consent was granted? They approached us for guidance, requesting our design team to evaluate their plans and suggest improvements that could enhance the home’s energy efficiency and comfort.

Initially, the home was designed with 140mm walls and an assumed airtightness of 3.0 air changes per hour (ACH). However, based on recent testing of similar builds, which showed airtightness at 4.5 ACH, we opted for a more conservative estimate for a home adhering to the current building code. The thermal model revealed the following results for the original design:

Heat GainsHeat Losses
Annual heating demand:
91.1Kwh
Walls, ceiling and floor:
68.4Kwh
Solar through windows:
36.9Kwh
Windows:
39.9Kwh
Heating through appliances:
13.4Kwh
Ventilation Kitchen/bathroom etc:
32.1Kwh

Heat GainsHeat Losses
Annual heating demand:
32.9Kwh
Walls, ceiling and floor:
56.8Kwh
Solar through windows:
48.6Kwh
Windows:
28.5Kwh
Heating through appliances:
13.4Kwh
Ventilation Kitchen/bathroom etc:
5.9Kwh

Heat GainsHeat Losses
Annual heating demand:
24.7Kwh
Walls, ceiling and floor:
57.9Kwh
Solar through windows:
54.9Kwh
Windows:
22.7Kwh
Heating through appliances:
13.4Kwh
Ventilation Kitchen/bathroom etc:
5.9Kwh

Heat GainsHeat Losses
Annual heating demand:
22.1Kwh
Walls, ceiling and floor:
51.9Kwh
Solar through windows:
53Kwh
Windows:
22.4Kwh
Heating through appliances:
13.4Kwh
Ventilation Kitchen/bathroom etc:
5.9Kwh

Related

similar posts

Overheating In NZ Homes (Again)
Why Is Your Winter Power Bill So High?
Cold, Damp & Expensive: Why It’s Time to Rethink Kiwi Homes